Arts organisations often struggle with month-end, not because information is not available, but because manual processes prevent month-end close from happening faster. As a result, management reporting is delayed. We explore how arts organisations can report at month-end more quickly in order to make better funding, project, and operational decisions.
While working in lean teams, arts finance functions must still correctly manage funds, analyse where savings can be made, and effectively communicate their findings to leaders. But, when relying on manual processes, this data is often outdated as soon as it’s exported from the organisation’s finance system.
Finance leaders in arts organisations rely on real-time insight and financial control to make informed decisions. Visit our market page to learn how Xledger supports arts, culture, and venues organisations with automation and insight.
Why is month-end reporting difficult for arts organisations?
Many arts organisations are not-for-profit and rely on a variety of income streams to operate, including donations, legacies, local authority funding, and public fundraising. As a result, arts finance teams are responsible for managing a complex mix of funds.
Arts finance teams may need to report on the following income streams:
- Restricted and unrestricted funds
- Grants from Arts Council England and other local authority funders
- Ticket sales and venue hire income
- Memberships, donations, legacies, and sponsorship funds
- Different productions, exhibitions, and programmes
While operating in lean finance teams, the same people must manage day-to-day transactions, track and report on funds, complete payroll and budgeting, and produce management accounts at each month-end. Added altogether, these responsibilities can become a huge task list, particularly at an already busy month-end close.
When month-end arrives, and finance teams must complete reports while managing business-as-usual (BAU), reporting can be delayed, impacting the whole organisation.
Here, finance leaders and other decision-makers must make decisions based on outdated data rather than live information, leading to potential budget risks or a failure to act when ticket sales are performing poorly.
Likewise, finance teams can end up spending considerable amounts of time preparing reports for management accounts, therefore, they have little time to analyse the numbers and provide meaningful commentary. However, being aware of this reactive cycle of reporting is the first step to overcoming it.
We’ve outlined five ways arts finance teams can produce management accounts quicker, including automating repetitive tasks and empowering budget holders with real-time insights.
1. Simplify your chart of accounts
Reporting is often delayed when organisations attempt to capture every reporting requirement by extending the COA to include reporting dimensions within it.
To solve this issue, finance teams can use different dimensions for projects, departments, venues, productions, or funds, alongside a simpler COA. This helps to reduce complexity while ensuring that finance teams can report across multiple different dimensions accurately.
2. Reduce spreadsheet reliance
Spreadsheets are a valuable tool for finance teams, but heavy reliance on them usually indicates an opportunity to gain efficiencies by upgrading processes or systems.
Reporting, reconciliation, and consolidation are all activities that should be done within a finance system, but outdated software often fails to support this type of efficient accounting.
As a result, arts organisations may struggle with:
- Version control
- Duplicated data entry
- Increased risk of errors
- Additional reconciliation tasks
- Delays and difficulties producing reports
Reducing spreadsheet reliance doesn’t mean completely eliminating them. Instead, best practice is to ensure that core reporting, consolidation, and financial control processes all happen within the central finance system.
3. Automate time-consuming financial processes
Many month-end activities are time-consuming and repetitive, which is why many arts organisations benefit from automating accounting tasks. For example, by automating bank reconciliations, recurring journals, and invoice approvals, finance can free up time to perform value-adding analysis work.
In these instances, automation helps arts finance teams gain quicker access to accurate performance or show data to analyse and present in management accounts.
4. Improve visibility across projects and funding streams
Arts organisations often need to report financial information in multiple different ways, from project to funding source, and venue to department budget. When reporting structures aren’t consistent, arts finance teams can find themselves duplicating efforts to produce similar reports for different stakeholders.
However, this is often time-consuming and prone to reporting errors. To solve this, try creating custom report templates that format information to eliminate duplicated effort and increase reporting consistency over time.
5. Give budget holders access to information
Finance teams often face a backlog of queries about performance and show ticket sales, remaining project budgets, sponsorship income, and many other financial information requests. However, this puts unnecessary strain on finance as they must still complete BAU.
By providing department managers and programme leads with real-time dashboards tailored to their job roles, finance can reduce the bottleneck of queries while empowering budget holders to take control of their spending.
When month-end then rolls around, budget holders already have access to the necessary information to create reports, without having to ask finance and wait for their response.
What does good look like at month-end for arts finance teams?
An efficient month-end in an arts organisation relies less on accessing data, and more on how it’s handled. It should aim to provide key stakeholders with the real-time visibility they need to report on data and make informed decisions that benefit the entire organisation.
In practice, this looks like:
- Faster reporting and close cycles
- Increased confidence in data accuracy
- Greater visibility across projects, performances, and funds
- Less time spent on manual reconciliation and consolidation
- More time available for analysis and planning
The ultimate goal is not simply to close the month faster. It is to create more capacity for value-added finance activities.
Shifting from a reactive to a proactive finance team, one that prioritises automation and insights, will help arts finance teams to tackle month-end effectively. After this, finance can produce faster management accounts and free up time to analyse the information in those accounts, aiding long-term decision-making in the process.
Contact our dedicated team of solution consultants, all from accounting backgrounds, to understand how Xledger can streamline your month-end while providing your finance team with accurate, real-time insights.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Month-end reporting in arts organisations often relies on manual reconciliations, spreadsheet consolidation, project reporting requirements, and the need to track restricted and unrestricted funding streams. Manually completing these tasks typically results in delayed production as finance is waiting on information or sifting through data errors.
While every organisation is different, many finance leaders aim to produce management accounts within five to ten working days of month-end. The most effective organisations work towards real-time reporting, meaning that management accounts are ready on the day of month-end.
Using dimensional reporting structures allows arts organisations to track restricted and unrestricted funding more effectively without creating complexity within the chart of accounts.
Get in touch
Have any questions on Xledger’s finance software?
Get in touch with one of our dedicated team.
Contact person




